Food Travel [2026]: 9 Cities Worth Visiting Just for the Eating

The cost of living crisis — the experience of essential expenses (housing, food, energy, healthcare) consuming a larger share of income than they did five years ago — has been one of the defining economic experiences of the 2021-2026 period in most wealthy countries. Here is the honest analysis of what's driving it and what interventions have realistic evidence of helping.

What's Actually Driving It

The cost of living crisis has multiple causes that operate differently across different expense categories. The 2021-2023 inflation episode — driven by pandemic supply chain disruption, demand shifts, energy price shocks, and monetary stimulus — raised prices broadly. Even as inflation rates have returned to central bank targets, the price level has not returned to pre-pandemic levels; prices remain elevated even when their rate of increase has slowed. This distinction between "inflation has moderated" (accurate) and "things are no longer expensive" (inaccurate) is the most important clarification in cost of living discussions.

Housing costs are driven by a more structural and longer-running problem: in most major metropolitan areas in wealthy countries, housing supply has not kept pace with demand for decades. Restrictive zoning that limits density, lengthy permitting processes, neighborhood opposition to development, and the political economy of homeowner interests protecting asset values have produced housing markets where prices significantly exceed what incomes support for first-time buyers and where rents consume disproportionate shares of income for renters. The inflation episode made this worse but didn't create it.

What Actually Helps

The interventions with the strongest evidence for addressing housing affordability — the most consequential and most persistent element of the cost of living crisis — are supply-side: zoning reform that permits higher-density development, streamlining permitting processes, and public investment in social and affordable housing. These are politically difficult because they redistribute costs and benefits in ways that existing homeowners, who are also voters at higher rates than renters, often oppose. The interventions that are politically easier (rent control, housing vouchers) address individual situations without improving the underlying supply constraint and can in some forms (strict rent control that reduces housing supply) worsen it.

For individuals experiencing cost of living pressures, the practical options are more limited than policy debates acknowledge: geographic arbitrage (moving to lower cost-of-living areas, which has become more accessible for remote workers), lifestyle adjustments that prioritize expenditures that provide genuine value over social conformity spending, and income improvement through skill development in high-demand areas. These are real but imperfect compensations for structural economic conditions that individual behavior can partially mitigate but not resolve.

My honest take: Prices are elevated because the price level didn't return to pre-pandemic levels even as inflation rates moderated. Housing's cost of living problem is structural and predates the inflation episode — supply constraints are the cause, and supply increases are the only durable solution. Interventions that don't address supply don't fix the problem.