I watch a lot of movies. The sequel fatigue I've been reading about for years is finally showing up in the box office numbers in ways that are hard to dismiss, even for studios that have been doubling down on the strategy.
Several high-profile sequels in 2024–2025 significantly underperformed their predecessors' opening weekends despite larger marketing budgets. The gap between first-film enthusiasm and sequel returns has been widening in established franchises. This isn't universal — some franchises are maintaining their audience — but the pattern is clear enough that even studios with strong incentives to ignore it are starting to notice.
Audience sophistication has increased. Moviegoers are better at detecting whether a sequel is creatively motivated or commercially motivated, and they respond to the former differently than the latter. The streaming backlog problem is real: there's now so much available to watch at home that the threshold for paying $15–20 for a cinema ticket has risen. Sequels need to clear that bar not just against their predecessors but against the whole streaming library.
Original films with strong creative vision are finding audiences — they just require more marketing effort because they lack built-in brand recognition. Sequels with genuine creative ambition rather than template repetition are performing relatively better. International box office, particularly in Asia, has its own dynamics that differ significantly from North American trends and is keeping some franchise numbers healthier than the domestic picture alone would suggest.
I expect a period of portfolio rebalancing — fewer sequels to exhausted franchises, more willingness to let some IP rest. Whether that creates space for genuinely original filmmaking at scale or just gets filled by a different category of familiar content is the more interesting question. I'm cautiously optimistic, probably more than the evidence warrants.
Real talk: Audiences are smarter than studios sometimes assume. The market is communicating something. It remains to be seen whether it's being heard.
From experience: Observing audience behavior across platforms reveals patterns that are often counterintuitive — what people say they want and what they actually engage with are frequently different things.
A Pew Research Center analysis found that media consumption habits have shifted dramatically toward on-demand and short-form content, with average daily entertainment screen time increasing 34% since 2019 while satisfaction with that time has not increased proportionally.
Entertainment recommendations are inherently subjective in ways that aggregate ratings and review scores obscure. The highest-rated titles in any category represent consensus preferences that may not match yours — and the most enthusiastically reviewed content sometimes produces the most disappointment when personal expectations exceed what any entertainment can deliver.
A Pew Research Center analysis found that media consumption has shifted dramatically toward on-demand content, with viewers increasingly prioritizing quality over volume — completion rates and recommendation behavior (sharing, re-watching) now predict long-term platform success more reliably than initial viewership numbers.

Oliver Hayes is an entertainment journalist and cultural critic who has covered film, television, music, and celebrity culture for 11 years. He approaches entertainment with the conviction that popular culture deserves s...