I was a mediocre student until my third year of university, when I happened to read a paper on retrieval practice and changed how I studied. The improvement was dramatic enough that I've been interested in learning science ever since.
Testing yourself on material — rather than re-reading it — is the most consistently supported learning technique in cognitive science literature. The "testing effect" has been replicated across hundreds of studies, age groups, and subject matters: trying to recall information strengthens the memory trace more than passively reviewing it. Flashcards, practice problems, writing what you remember without looking at notes, teaching the material out loud — all of these activate retrieval. Highlighting and re-reading feel productive but have minimal effect on long-term retention.
Reviewing material at increasing intervals — rather than massed practice (cramming) — produces far superior long-term retention. The spacing effect is one of the most robust findings in memory research. Anki and similar spaced repetition software optimize review timing algorithmically. The intuition behind it: memory consolidates during sleep and strengthens each time you recall something and then sleep again. Massing all your review into one pre-test session doesn't give the brain time to consolidate.
Practicing different problem types or topics in mixed order (rather than blocking by type) is harder and feels less productive in the moment — but produces significantly better performance on tests. Blocked practice feels good because each repetition reinforces a pattern; interleaving forces the brain to discriminate between problem types, which is what real-world application requires. This is counterintuitive and I resisted it for longer than I should have.
Passive re-reading. Highlighting without testing yourself on what you highlighted. Studying in sessions that are too long — focus and retrieval practice quality degrades significantly after 45–60 minutes without a break. And note-taking that transcribes rather than summarizes — writing in your own words processes the material; transcription doesn't.
Real talk: Studying hard is less important than studying right. The cognitive science has been clear on this for 30 years; almost no one teaches it.
Re-reading highlighted notes — the most common study technique — is one of the least effective methods by research standards. It produces familiarity without producing durable memory. The discomfort of self-testing is precisely the signal that genuine learning is occurring, which is why students consistently underuse retrieval practice even when they know it works better. Feeling productive and being productive are different things in learning contexts.

Rachel Foster is an education researcher, former high school teacher, and learning science writer who covers how people learn, what education systems do well and poorly, and the evidence behind effective teaching and stu...