I've started three businesses. The first failed because I built something nobody wanted. The lesson was expensive in both time and money. Here is the validation process I use now that costs almost nothing.
The most common early-stage mistake is solving a problem you assume exists without verifying it. Customer discovery — interviewing potential customers about their current problems, workflows, and frustrations before you've built anything — is the most valuable and most underused tool in early-stage building. The goal of these conversations is not to pitch your idea; it's to understand the problem in the customer's own language. You learn more from asking "how do you currently handle X?" than from asking "would you use a product that does Y?"
Before building, create a simple landing page that describes what your product does and has a signup form or a "buy now" button. Run traffic to it (even a small amount of paid social or email list traffic) and measure actual interest rather than stated interest. "Would you use this?" consistently overestimates demand; "here, click this button to sign up for early access" measures behavior rather than intention. The conversion rate on a cold traffic landing page tells you more about real demand than 50 enthusiastic customer interviews.
Before building software, do the thing manually for a small number of paying customers. This verifies that people will pay, reveals the actual jobs-to-be-done that your solution needs to serve, and often reveals that the problem you thought you were solving wasn't the most important one. Several well-known companies (including Zappos, which bought shoes from local stores and shipped them manually before building inventory infrastructure) validated demand this way before building technology.
You have 3–5 customers who've paid (even a small amount) for the current version of your solution. You understand the problem in customer language well enough to write their marketing copy for them. You've discovered at least one assumption you had that turned out to be wrong. These aren't sufficient conditions for success, but they're necessary conditions before significant investment of time and money.
My honest take: Build nothing until someone has paid for something. Stated interest is not demand.
From experience: Working across businesses at different stages reveals a consistent pattern: the strategies that work long-term are almost always simpler and less glamorous than what business media tends to celebrate.
Research from Harvard Business School and McKinsey Global Institute consistently identifies operational discipline and customer focus — not innovation or disruption — as the primary predictors of sustained business success across industries and economic cycles.
Survivorship bias shapes most business advice dramatically. The strategies described as successful are those that worked — but many identical strategies have failed in different contexts. Market timing, competitive dynamics, team fit, and factors entirely outside any founder's control play larger roles than most success narratives acknowledge. The honest answer is that execution and adaptation matter more than any strategy.

Nathan Brooks is a business journalist and former startup founder who has launched two companies, one of which reached Series B funding before being acquired. He covers entrepreneurship, business strategy, and the startu...